Seeing salvation...
...in the National Gallery
The National Gallery chose to mark the Millennium by holding an
exhibition of Images of Christ. The purpose was not to
present the Life of Christ in art, but to look at the way artists over the
centuries had faced the difficulties of representing Jesus - as God who
became man, as both human and divine, whose suffering was both personal
and cosmic, who is both Shepherd and Sheep, Saviour and Sacrifice, Prince
of Peace and Suffering Servant. Although grounded in items drawn from its
own enormous resources, the Gallery included items from twenty-seven other
lenders (mainly UK public collections) to balance the displays and broaden
the time range represented. There were seven sections, with a room devoted
to each: Sign and Symbol; The Dual Nature; The True Likeness; Passion
and Compassion; The Saving Body; and The Abiding Presence.
There
was something to engage with, or to learn, from nearly all the works, and
only a few I found positively off-putting - such as the statue of Jesus
with his fingers deep in the open wound in his side. Some were
overpowering in their stark simplicity - such as Francesco de Zurbarin’s
Agnus Dei (or Bound Lamb) - a lamb on an altar with feet bound
together, innocent, trusting and helpless. Even Holman Hunt’s well known
Light of The World, which has never appealed to me, had a majestic
quality - partly from its size (over 7ft in height), partly being fresh
after cleaning.
The
earliest Christian art was all symbolic. Springing from a tradition where
the name of God was too sacred to write, it was unthinkable to portray the
person of Jesus in picture or statue for many centuries. Hence the use of
word-signs and verbal imagery - the fish, the cross, the chi-rho ‘monogram
of Christ’ and the IHS trigram, which evolved among
Christian communities in the first four centuries AD.
Even centuries later it was technically impossible to represent imagery
of Christ as light - or the Light. It was only when artists began
using oil in painting in the late 15th century that it became possible to
represent darkness, and this was necessary to contrast with light. A
delightful nativity scene from this period Nativity at Night by
Geetgen tot Sint Jans, has an infant Jesus radiating light in a dark
stable, brightly illuminating the face of a very young Mary and attendant
shepherds.
The
picture that held my attention for the most time, and had several return
visits, was Murillo’s Heavenly and Earthly Trinities. It has
rather conventional figures for God the Father (old man) and the Holy
Spirit (as a dove), over Jesus as a young boy with his parents on either
side. Most striking is the sheer humanity and ordinariness of both Mary
and Joseph, whose outward gaze invites the viewer to behold, and engage
with the two trinities. There is a place for us ordinary folk there. The
rather idealised boy Christ-child seems to personify a purity and
innocence for us to emulate. But he is standing on a stone which could be
an altar, a grave, or the ‘corner-stone’ over which we can stumble,
indicating perhaps the difficulty of belief in Trinitarian doctrine.
However its message of love was the most powerful, in both human and
heavenly trinities; for love cannot be complete without three dimensions -
love given to, love received from, love shared for - which is central to
my understanding of the Trinity.
Among the many nativity and epiphany scenes was a curiously attractive,
tiny, wood panel Virgin and Child. Set in a 15th century kitchen,
Mary looks about to bath the baby in a bowl by the fire with a basket of
towels or nappies close at hand.
For
me the most interesting work in the True Likeness section was
Claude Mellan’s Veil of St Veronica. An impressive enough picture
from an engraving, but amazingly drawn as a single line, radiating in a
spiral from the tip of the nose but varying in width to create the image.
In the centre of the Passion and Compassion room was a
life-sized limestone statue of Christ on a Cold Stone. Christ,
naked save for a crown of thorns, sits in an attitude of inconsolable
sorrow - vulnerable and waiting what is to come. It evokes responses of
compassion for the sufferer and by extension all who are degraded; sorrow
for the sin which is the cause; and gratitude for the loving sacrifice on
our behalf. The more of humanity we see the in the life of Christ, the
more closely we seem to approach the divine.
The
image that I would most like to retain is of a work that was, ironically,
not on display but represented by a picture. This is the statue Ecce
Homo by Mark Wallinger, which we saw in January when it was displayed
on the ‘empty plinth’ in Trafalgar Square. This small figure of
Christ, although nearly naked, looks a contemporary person (indeed it was
cast from a real person). Christ for today - one of us, but also separate.
He wears a crown of gold barbed wire and looks out on the world, dwarfed
by the enormous platform on which he stands. Crowded mental images form
and change, leaping from ‘Insignificant man’ to ‘Benign Overseer’
to ‘Prince of Peace’ to ‘Suffering Servant’… and back again, the
way a credit card hologram changes with the slightest movement.
I’m
glad we made it to the National Gallery - it was a good day out, in spite
of the enormous queue and long wait to get in. It is a tribute to the way
the exhibition has been conceived and presented that so many people came
to see it and made it so enormously successful. It was also free - which
helped. We know from those we met and talked to that its appeal was broad
- not just to signed-up Christians or art lovers. It had something
significant and valuable for those who were ‘not religious’, those
with little or no faith - like the young lady we met on the train to
London, bumped into at the exhibition, and chatted with on the return
journey.
Why it should be so is not clear but, in addition to personal benefit
from this exhibition, there is a sense of hope and encouragement that we
have not as a society, completely given in to mindless, Godless, dumbed-down
trivia for our leisure time. Although smaller in scale, Seeing
Salvation has been in proportion very much more successful than The
Dome in attracting and satisfying visitors. We can all take heart
from that.
Jim McLean
Return to the
Articles contents page
|